Wednesday, June 21, 2017
Monday, June 19, 2017
"On June 19, 1964, the Senate ended a long debate, overcoming a record-setting filibuster to join the House in approving the Civil Rights Act. The landmark law was a turning point in American history, as it addressed discrimination and segregation on a national level.
Link: See the Civil Rights Act
This landmark civil rights bill would not have gone through without LBJ's pushing. Southern white supremacists in the Senate attempted to block it by filibustering which did not work. This was one of his proudest moments. To bad he spoiled his reputation later with adventurism in Viet Nam.
This is a conservative website.
I agree with the statement, but, don't know enough about the specific case to agree or not agree with the rest of the article.
Thanks to 44 shot for the link.
Given the controversial nature of this case and the numerous issues involved, an appeal is almost certain and appellate decision will help clarifythe law
"A member of Donald Trump’s personal legal team sent out to deny the president is under investigation, did just the opposite on “Fox News Sunday” — twice saying “he’s being investigated.”
Jay Sekulow made the remarks during a contentious back and forth with host Chris Wallace, one of a series of shows on which the attorney repeatedly insisted that Trump wasn’t under investigation by Justice Department Special Counsel Robert Mueller.
Sekulow told Wallace that Trump’s firing of FBI Director James Comey last month was “based on numerous events, including recommendations from his attorney general and the deputy attorney general’s office.”
“He takes the action that they also recommended and now he’s being investigated by the Department of Justice. Because the special counsel, under the special counsel regulations, reports still to the Department of Justice, not an independent counsel,” Sekulow said.
“So, he’s being investigated for taking the action that the attorney general and deputy attorney general recommended him to take, by the agency who recommended the termination. So that’s the constitutional threshold question here.”
When Wallace noted that Sekulow had just admitted Trump was under investigation, Sekulow accused the host of trying to “re-phrase” his words — prompting Wallace to say “the tape will speak for itself.”
“I do not appreciate you putting words in my mouth, when I’ve been crystal clear that the president is not and has not been under investigation,” Sekulow shot back.
On Friday, Trump tweeted, “I am being investigated for firing the FBI Director by the man who told me to fire the FBI Director! Witch Hunt.”
Sekulow told “Fox News Sunday” and three other shows that Trump’s tweet was based solely on a Washington Post report, and he insisted Trump wasn’t under investigation.
On CBS’ “Face the Nation,” host John Dickerson asked Sekulow how he knew that.
“Because we’ve received no notice of investigation. There has been no notification from the special counsel’s office that the president is under investigation. In fact, to the contrary. What we know is what James Comey said, the last thing we know is when he testified just a couple weeks back. That the president was not and is not a target of investigation,” Sekulow answered.
Sekulow also said he “can’t imagine a scenario where the president would not be aware of it.”
But a former federal prosecutor, Brad Simon, told The Post those assertions were “somewhat fanciful.”
The feds “never formally advise someone they’re under investigation,” Simon said, adding: “It usually becomes apparent when they start issuing subpoenas.”
In some cases, Simon said, the feds will issue a “target letter” following a grand jury subpoena, usually when a defense lawyer is trying to decide whether to let a client testify.
“The fact that [Trump] hasn’t received a letter doesn’t mean he’s not the subject of an investigation,” he said.
“Letters are only issued upon request. That’s the long-established practice of the Justice Department.”
Thursday, June 15, 2017
Political violence, by both sides, in this country is becoming a crisis. The echo chambers, political and religious hatreds. and toxic, polarizing politics are now bearing their bitter fruit. This has created a feeling of solidarity among congressmen for now. Le'ts hope it lasts. Don't bet on it. The investigation of Trump will stoke up the fires to even new levels. Hatred of Muslims seems to be growing. God help America.
It reminds me of the Benjamin Franklin saying, 'experience (reality) keep a dear school-- but fools will learn in no other.'
When the Trump's Justice department appointed a man of integrity and political independence as Special Prosecutor (no doubt with Trump's approval), many could see that this day would eventually arrive. The President (and perhaps others on his staff) is/are under investigation for obstruction of justice for his dealings with former FBI Director Comey and perhaps others officials. Anyone who knows anything about criminal law, criminal procedure, etc. knows there is probable cause to believe that Trump violated the law. Sessions confirmed part of Comey's account. The mystery tapes, if the exist, could clear Trump. Yet, no one in the White House will confirm of deny if they exist. Does this sound like the actions of a totally innocent suspect? If there are tapes that support Trump, why not release them? The logical conclusion is that either there are no tapes or the tapes prove Comey is right. The special prosecutor can get them, and there is no executive privilege in criminal cases for Trump's toadies to hide behind. Some Republicans are already talking about getting rid of the Special Prosecutor.
Will history repeat itself (e.g. Watergate)? The truth will eventually come out about Trump cronies and even persons even appointed by Trump being involved in negotiation with the Russians regarding the election. Flynn and Sessions have already lied about the issue. When politicians are involved, whether on the right or left, 'where there's smoke, there's almost always fire.'
Some Trumpistas will respond with their dumb comebacks (e.g Hillary Clinton would be worse). The dumbest excuses seem to admit that Trump did it but should be excused because he was a 'rookie,' or 'political novice.' Ignorance of the law is not a valid legal excuse. Stupidity and lack of ethical sense is not an excuse. If a rookie cop took a bribe would we excuse him because he is a naive rookie and doesn't remember anything from the policy academy about ethics and bribery? If Trump weren't President, a grand jury would be convening to investigate. This is what happens to lower level political crooks. Anyone who knows anything about the law of criminal evidence knows that Trump's behavior in trying to buddy up with Comey and his telling all others at the meeting to leave is evidence of criminal intent or knowledge of guilt.
Some sycophants will retreat even further into their irrational, delusional, echo chambers. Some will finally come to their senses and be glad the investigation has finally started. Although it is probably a long shot, there may have been no criminal or ethical violations. That's why all should welcome the investigation. At this point the evidentiary cards are stacked heavily against Trump, but I could be wrong and applaud the Special Prosecutor.
This who situation is a sad and serious crisis for America. We need the truth to get past this. This topic will dominate the news for months. Look back at Watergate and Nixon.
Tuesday, June 13, 2017
American foreign policy changes every time Trump tweets of gives a speech. How do you negotiate with a national leader who is part chameleon, part eel and part confused teenager. Europe cannot trust him.
The Western alliance against Trump's buddy Putin is in danger. I wouldn't want to live in Eastern Europe while Trump in Prez. People in Latvia, Lithuania and Estonia better need to start preparing for guerilla warfare if the on-again off-again bromance between Trump and Putin doesn't end once and for all.
He apparently later changed his mind. A few months ago he called NATO "obsolete."
Trump sent his Secretary of State to the Middle East to try to patch up things between Qatar and Saudi Arabia. The largest U.S military base in the Middle East in in Qatar and we have long had good relations with the Saudis. Then, Trump blast the Qataris.
Attorney General Jeff Sessions will be testifying before a Senate Commitee shortly. He has lied before, and gave a B.S. explanation for the 'discrepancy'. I guess his excuse is "I was too dumb to understand the question." Hey, Sessions is entitled to his own 'alternative facts." In unfortunately, he is also the federal government's law enforcement officer. The consequences for the rule of law could be tragic.
Trump is a chronic liar. Check out a reputable fact check website (see below), think about what is said and analyze it. Trump won the factcheck.org
King of Whoppers award for 2015 and 2016. He beat out Hillary Clinton by a big margin.
A year ago, we broke with past practice and named Donald Trump our first ever “King of Whoppers.” This year, the reigning champ defended his title well – once again dominating our annual review of political whoppers.
At his campaign rallies, Trump regularly disparaged the media as “dishonest,” referring at one point to fact-checkers as “dishonest scum.” Yet, he peddled conspiracy theories from a supermarket tabloid and a website that serves as a platform for the alt-right.
The Republican president-elect used a thinly sourced story from the National Enquirer to make the baseless claim that Sen. Ted Cruz’s father “was with Lee Harvey Oswald” prior to John F. Kennedy’s assassination — a claim he doubled down on after Cruz already had dropped out of the presidential primary. Trump also cited Breitbart as evidence that he was “right” when he suggested that President Obama supported terrorists. No, Trump wasn’t right.
During the campaign, Trump also made the wild accusation that Obama “is the founder of ISIS,” the terrorist group based in Syria and Iraq, and retweeted a fake image of Fox News host Megyn Kelly that purported to show her posing with Saudi Prince Alwaleed Bin Talal.
Of course, we wrote about plenty of others who distorted the facts and made false claims in 2016. After all, it was the year when the facts caught up with Hillary Clinton’s numerous false and distorted claims regarding her use of a private email server while secretary of state. Contrary to what she said, Clinton did have classified material on her server and did not have government approval to use a private server because she never requested it.
Even so, Trump is in a league of his own." Note that they called Hillary on the carpet.
Check out he website for a complete analysis.
He will probably win again this year.
Sean Spicer said Hitler never used poison gas as a weapon. The list of Trump and Trump administration B.S. is endless.
"House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi says Attorney General Jeff Sessions “lied under oath” when he said he “did not have communications with the Russians” during the presidential campaign. She has called on him to resign.
Sessions says that, in context, his responses as part of the Senate confirmation process were “honest and correct as I understood it at the time.” He acknowledged that he should have told the Senate that he “did meet one Russian official a couple of times,” but he said any claims that he gave a false answer are “not correct.”
Please don't respond by saying that he's a better AG than Hillary would have appointed. Every time I try to talk to a Trump supporter about issues that make Trump look bad, they respond, that "he's better than Hillary." Obviously, a lot of people don't want to address issues and come up with B.S. responses that do not address the issues. Brain damage, thick skull or ideological blinders? These folks need to start addressing and facing facts. Get out of the delusional world. Get over the bromance, hero worship, or whatever it is and get real.
Time to abandon post truth, alternative facts. etc.
Please consider the following:
POST TRUTH AND CRITICAL THINKING
“I’m sorry, Jeannie, your answer was correct, but Kevin shouted his incorrect answer over yours, so he gets the points,” says the quiz master to a group of participants, in a cartoon with the caption “Facts don’t matter.” The cartoon gives a clear picture of the post-truth and surreal world. Oxford Dictionaries (OD) announced post-truth as its 2016 International Word of the Year. Post-truth “relates to or denotes circumstances in which objective facts [truth] are less influential in shaping public opinion than
appeals to emotion and personal belief.”
 the intense admiration or affection (or the opposites)for the speaker can also overrule the truth] Post-truth also applies to making sweeping claims about objective reality without any, or any substantial .evidence.
See also https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Post-truth_politics
In the post-truth and surreal era, we are constantly bombarded with messages that can be labeled as “half-truth” or “no-truth.” Propagandists speak in such a way that the targeted people believe and accept disinformation as information. They are successful in their mission as they are convinced that the audiences can be persuaded, manipulated and deceived. Lies that are told in a convincing way are treated as truth and result in shaping public opinion. Lies coupled with emotional appeals win the hearts of the weak who do not know how to differentiate between falsehood and truth, information and disinformation, honesty and dishonesty. We live in a world where deceit, disinformation, distortion, falsehood and fiction try to have victory over information and truth. In the post-truth era, certain lies are considered too benign to be treated as lies.” See book mentioned here (optional) Weaponized Lies: How to Think Critically in the Post-Truth Era https://www.amazon.com/Weaponized-Lies-Think-Critically-Post-Truth/dp/1101983825
FAKE NEWS, AN ELEMENT OF POST-TRUTH THINKING
This term has two meanings. 1. Present something as ‘news’ that has no factual basis, and
2. Labelling news that we don’t like as ‘fake news’ without checking it, so we don’t’have to consider it.
Below is an example of the effects of the first type of ‘fake news.
“Family and friends said they are struggling to understand how Welch apparently became so fixated on a fake news story that he drove from North Carolina with a Colt long rifle, a .38-caliber revolver and a shotgun, determined to take action. The viral Internet tale, which emerged shortly before the presidential election, falsely linked Hillary Clinton, her campaign chairman and the owner of Comet to the alleged sex-slave conspiracy.”
Some insight is given by this answer to a question put to Pres. Trump:Mr. Trump wanted his inauguration crowd to be the biggest ever, so in his mind it was, no matter what was plainly obvious to anyone with a pair of eyes.”
Consider his response to ABC’s David Muir, who challenged him to back up his repeated, and repeatedly debunked, claim that millions of people voted illegally — which he insists is the reason he lost the popular vote by nearly three million votes. Rather than admitting he had no evidence, Mr. Trump said: “You know what’s important? Millions of people agree with me when I say that.” In other words, facts aren’t important; blind trust in a leader is.
ANOTHER ELEMENT OF THE POST-TRUTH SYNDROME IS THE IDEA OF ‘ALTERNATIVE FACTS.
"Alternative facts" is a phrase used by U.S. Counselor to the President Kellyanne Conway during a Meet the Press interview on January 22, 2017, in which she defended White House Press Secretary Sean Spicer's false statement about the attendance at Donald Trump's inauguration as President of the United States. When pressed during the interview with Chuck Todd to explain why Spicer "utter[ed] a provable falsehood", Conway stated that Spicer was giving "alternative facts." Todd responded, "
Conway's use of the phrase "alternative facts" to describe what are demonstrably falsehoods was widely mocked on social media and sharply criticized by journalists and media organizations, such as Dan Rather, Jill Abramson, and the Public Relations Society of America
Alternative facts are not facts. They're falsehoods. Choosing to desregard ‘facts’ (or substantial, credible evidence to the contrary, or the lack thereof instead of a rational conclusion based on evidence) are examples. See also https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alternative_facts
Critical think is even more crucial in the post-fact age. What to do? Use fact check websites. Open and print this link for 6 of the best.
Saturday, June 10, 2017
Friday, June 09, 2017
See the links at
His over-the top rantings on the media should give. He has called the media “the enemy of the people.” https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2017/02/24/donald-trump-cpac-media-enemy-of-the-people/98347970/
Most of his executive orders regarding immigration have been found unconstitutional by the courts. The Supreme Court is scheduled to hear one of these cases next year.
Wednesday, June 07, 2017
Support For Donald Trump's Impeachment Is Now Higher Than His Approval Rating Support For Trump's Impeachment Is Now Higher Than His Approval Rating
The president's approval rating dipped from nearly 42 percent to just 36 percent over the weekend, according to a Gallup daily tracking poll published Monday. Trump's declining popularity is inching closer toward his all-time low of 35 percent as president in March, when Gallup had the president’s approval at just 35 percent. What's more, nearly 43 percent of American voters support the idea of beginning the official impeachment process for Trump, according to a Politico/Morning Consult poll published Wednesday."
To keep up with the latest from the most immature, delusional, egomaniacal President ever, see
Friday, June 02, 2017
The decison was unanimous. I'm surprised not even one of the liberals dissented.One the one hand the provocation rule adds another complex dimension to the issues, and is not supported by Supreme Court precedent. On the other hand, it seems reasonable and fair, and the Court frequently avoids its precedents. I vote in favor of the provocation rule. This is an area of the where we need to tighten up, not loosen up.