Monday, April 22, 2013
Surprise: Boston bombing suspects did not have gun licenses, could not legally have purchased handguns
I know it may be hard for some to believe, but these (alleged) criminals wantonly failed to follow state and federal law on firearms. If we only had more laws, these folks would have been deterred from carrying and using guns during their murderous spree.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
According to the HF's article "'The younger brother could not have applied as he is not 21 years of age and the older brother did not have a license to carry and we have no record of him ever applying,' Riviello said."
ReplyDeleteYou correctly said, " ...these (alleged) criminals wantonly failed to follow state and federal law on firearms.".
If this is the case, how could more gun laws have deterred these murderers? They didn't respect the federal and state firearm statutes currently in place. Stricter gun laws only infringe on people's fundamental 2A right. Which is clearly a violation committed by government.
As the saying goes, "Two wrongs don't make a right.".
ReplyDelete44: Thanks for the comments. Looks like we see eye to eye on this.
ReplyDeleteUh . . . hold the phone . . . where were the guns purchased?
ReplyDeletenow the government will be requiring background checks on the purchases of pressure cookers...
ReplyDeleteI don't think it matters much where those two morons obtained their guns. As anonymous indicated, it was the dastardly pressure cookers that caused mass mayhem and murder. I'm waiting for the anti-gunners' lecture about how pressure cookers are not designed to kill and maim people. Try explaining that to the marathon's victims. Truth is it was human malice that did the harm, not inanimate objects like pressure cookers and guns.
ReplyDelete