By Dr. Ray Kessler, who is, incidentally, a retired Prof. of Criminal Justice, former defense attorney and prosecutor is your host. I am also a part-time instructor in Criminal Justice at Richland College, an outstanding, 2-year institution in Dallas, TX. https://richlandcollege.edu/ Note that I do NOT select which ads run on the blog.
Wednesday, May 07, 2014
Justice Sotomayor's ideology
The NYT has an interesting article on Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor who is now in her 5th year on the Court. She has not disappointed her appointer, generally taking the liberal stance. She took heat, but, but despite marginal qualifications, was still confirmed by the Democratic majority in the Senate in spite of her remark that
"“I would hope,” she said, “that a wise Latina woman with the richness of her experience would more often than not reach a better conclusion than a white male who hasn’t lived that life.” Of course, at her Supreme Court confirmation hearing she described the remark as a "rhetorical flourish." Personally, I agree with the conservative National Review that her dissent in the recent "affirmative action" case was a "a case study in the moral and legal corrosion that inevitably results from elevating ethnic-identity politics over the law.” Linda Chavez, a New York Post columnist, said Justice Sotomayor was “unable to divorce her legal reasoning from her own sense of racial grievance.” (quote from NYT at link). We have too many cultural/ideological warriors on the Court and not enough "Justices." IMHO, the Justice who comes closest to actually deciding cases on something other than ideology is Justice Kennedy. (see post below on ideology and First Amendment cases)
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
From the Weekly Standard's latest edition, see color blind law at http://www.weeklystandard.com/articles/colorblind-law_787363.html?nopager=1
ReplyDelete44: Thanks for the link. I recommend it to others. Justice Harlan's quote from Plessy is my and your theory also. It's sad that for the Left their social engineering plans are the supreme law of the land and the constitution can be ignorded.
ReplyDelete