Critics of Corrupting $ jump at new chance to get more

With the Supreme Court's recent invalidation of another federal campaign law on First Amendment grounds, the Left, including of course, the NYT have reminded us again of how corrupting all the money is, and that more $ means more corruption.   That, however has not stopped the Left  (like everyone else) from taking advantage of the extra corrupting money.  This should make it clear that politics is not about behaving ethically and free of corruption, it is about WINNING.  Apparently, to  Ms. Feinstein and her ilk, it is more important to be a corrupted winner than an honest loser. Or perhaps this can be explained by the fact that only Republicans are corrupted by  money.   Personally, I think the Court's decision was consistent and required by the First Amendment as that provision was designed to keep government out of the "marketplace of  ideas"