Honest Mexicans are often caught in a terrible dilemma. The government cannot or will not defend them against the cartels and their hangers-on. The villagers arm and organize and then the army tries to disarm them. They describe themselves as self-defense groups. Media and other sometimes use the term "vigilante" which can have a negative connotation. As reported by the New York Times (A6 1/15/14):
"Self-defense groups said four civilians were killed in the village of Antúnez when soldiers were confronted by a large crowd. The government confirmed one death."
"The government’s policy was intended to curb all armed groups in the state, but the soldiers’ actions seemed directed at the self-defense forces alone, except in Apatzingán, the stronghold of the Knights Templar (drug cartel), where soldiers and the police surrounded City Hall."
The Mexican government has tough choices to make and has to tread a fine line. However, when government fails its basic obligation to protect its citizens, the citizens have a right to defend themselves. My sympathies lie with the citizens.
I understand why Mexican citizens resort to vigilantism, but such action poses known dangers to innocent people. It's one thing for privately armed individuals to defend self and/or community. But quite another when hunting down bad guys.
ReplyDelete