As you may know we are in the
Sesquicentennial years of American Reconstruction. What lessons can we learn from this part of
our history?
George Santayana’s most famous
quote is probably “Those who
cannot remember
the past are
condemned to repeat it.” Yet, the history
of our species tends to show the same mistakes and atrocities in a never-ending
stream. However, the problem is no just
failure to remember, it included twisting history to justify whatever the
person believes. In prior posts I have
explored the “Lost Cause” delusions about race, slavery and the Civil War. These distortions have been rejected by most
and all of the leading Civil War historians. These delusions include the arguments that the
slaves weren’t really as bad off as the abolitionists
contended, that the South didn’t want to fight but was tricked into it by a
blood-thirsty Lincoln, that the Civil War was really about state’s rights and
nothing at all to do about and slavery, etc.
For more on this see E. H. Bonekemper’s The Myth of the Lost Cause, and/or William C Davis’ “The Lost
Cause,” or this article on Wikipedia, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lost_Cause_of_the_Confederacy
I have lived in Texas most of my adult life (with
stints in Ark and Tenn.) and still hear this hogwash from people today. Another delusion I thought had perished was
the twisting of the history of Reconstruction, one of the most violent and
repressive periods in American history.
I came across a New York Times article about a
woman from Texas who is running for a seat on the State Board of
Education. Her views are far-far right,
but the focus here is only on her views of Reconstruction. ” Although she condemned the Ku Klux Klan in one posting, she wrote
positively of its roots, writing that it started “as citizens trying to fight
back against a corrupt government when there were corrupt officials or no
officials at all to keep law and order in the rural areas.”
Where did that delusion come from?
Eric Foner, is one of the most highly regarded historians who has
written on the Civil War and Reconstruction.
His book Reconstruction,
touches on this issue. This is the main,
but not only source for the commentary below.
In the Preface to his book he notes the white-supremacist view of
Reconstruction found in many books. Foner focuses mainly on the works of
Professors William Dunning, John W. Burgess, and their students. According to
those authors, when the Civil War ended
the white south accepted the immorality of slavery and stood ready to do
justice to, and integrate blacks into society. The main problem was that blacks
were not fit for the political rights that the North had forced the South to
grant them (e.g. 13th, 14th and 15th
Amendments). Blacks were viewed as
child-like and incapable of understanding and being educated. Ignorant and corrupt blacks allied with
carpetbaggers and n-lovers oppressed honest whites who were forced to fight
back. Whites were subjected to “savage tyranny”
(p.609). The Klan helped protect whites from blacks who were vicious animals
and would rape and impregnate white women, mongrelizing the superior white
race.
On p. 609 Fonder writes that a small group of historians in the early 20th
Century (Dunning and Burgess) and their students began twisting the history of
Reconstruction based on the thesis of white supremacy and black unfitness. Foner calls this the “everlasting shame” of
the “nation’s fraternity of professional historians”. One of these historians called black suffrage
“the greatest political crime ever perpetrated by any people.”
Another historian commented on the impact of this twisted history, arguing
that it “froze themind of the white south” against outside pressures for
reform, eliminating segregation and restoring the vote to blacks. Many also appear to have been frozen in the theory of white supremacy.One need only look at Southern resistance to integrating schools and universities to see that mentality in action.
Although there were abuses by all sides during Reconstruction, there is
little doubt that the Klan (aided by white law-enforcement), during this period
was primarily a terrorist organization using violence, including murder against
blacks and their white supporters to enforce white supremacy (See Foner, pp.
119-24, 203-4, 425-444). The Klan and their allies used every
opportunity to disarm blacks and their white allies either by force or by gun
prohibitions in the Black Codes and Jim Crow Laws. In his book Gunfight, Prof. Adam Winkler wrote: (http://blogs.wsj.com/speakeasy/2011/09/21/love-your-gun-thank-the-black-panthers-says-new-book/
It was a
constant pressure among white racists to keep guns out of the hands of
African-Americans, because they would rise up and revolt.” he said. “The KKK began
as a gun-control organization. Before the Civil War, blacks were never allowed
to own guns. During the Civil War, blacks kept guns for the first time – either
they served in the Union army and they were allowed to keep their guns, or they
buy guns on the open market where for the first time there’s hundreds of
thousands of guns flooding the marketplace after the war ends. So they arm up
because they know who they’re dealing with in the South. White racists do
things like pass laws to disarm them, but that’s not really going to work. So
they form these racist posses all over the South to go out at night in large
groups to terrorize blacks and take those guns away. If blacks were disarmed,
they couldn’t fight back.”
Lynchings and massacres were not
unusual events. This is the reality of the Klan during Reconstruction.
I got out of the Army in May of 1958. Hung out in Panama City, Florida until I entered FSU in the fall. Seeing some of the bottom-rung whites in "Pannymaw", I figured that if they didn't have Negroes to look down on, they'd commit suicide. All groups seek some sort of pecking order so they have somebody to hold in contempt, same as our self-styled Elites in the upper echelons of government, banking and industry.
ReplyDeleteIIRC, the Dred Scott decision declared the Negro as 2/3 of a person. Many believed that if it were full citizenship as a full-fledged person, Negroes were legally entitled to firearms. No idea if that's true, but I wouldn't be surprised if it were.
I figure that in the KKK costume, the hats are form-fitting.
Art