By Dr. Ray Kessler, who is, incidentally, a retired Prof. of Criminal Justice, former defense attorney and prosecutor is your host. I am also a part-time instructor in Criminal Justice at Richland College, an outstanding, 2-year institution in Dallas, TX. https://richlandcollege.edu/ Note that I do NOT select which ads run on the blog.
Thursday, September 13, 2012
Latest on NDAA
Sorry I haven't had time to dig into the NDAA issue and report thereon. My apologies to 44. The start of the semester is always hectic and now I'm working on my Constitution Day Presentation. Check out this legal decision. FWIW: Note this is a Ron Paul-type libertarian website. To be on the safe side, if you have time, read the actual opinion.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
First of all, I don't know what's so vague about detaining enemy threats during hostilities, be they foreign or domestic. Throughout world history, traitors usually faced severe penalties during times of conflict. This has been true with America's past. So I ask again, what's so vague given the NDAA's prescribed circumstances? If clearer instructions are needed, so be it. But the actual premise behind the NDAA's enemy detention policy appears constitutionally sound.
ReplyDelete