Detroit: Justifiable Homicide Capital of the U.S. & case study on the necessity of protecting 2nd Amendent Rights

In this editorial, we find "When faced with an imminent threat, citizens are justified in defending themselves, even with deadly force. Michigan’s self-defense laws support that principle.

But citizens should not have to fend for themselves as a matter of course when it comes to public safety. Although Craig is right in saying the confrontations in a home invasions can’t be blamed on him, it must be his priority to re-establish — quickly — law and order in Detroit’s neighborhoods.

The chief is on record as saying more legal guns in Detroit would make the city safer, and has not backed down in advocating for appropriate self-defense. Craig is not encouraging vigilante-style violence, but rather defense in situations of imminent danger.

But not all Detroiters are capable of protecting themselves in such a manner. Relying on an armed citizenry is not the answer to Detroit’s effort to improve public safety. But Detroiters don’t feel confident in the police to protect them. That explains the rise in legal gun ownership.

The number of valid concealed pistol licenses in Wayne County increased by 10,000 from 2012 to 2013. At the beginning of 2013, there were just over 70,000 concealed pistol licenses in Wayne County, the highest rate of all Michigan counties. According to Michigan State Police, that number is now about 81,000.

From The Detroit News: http://www.detroitnews.com/article/20140502/OPINION01/305020002#ixzz30bdscUrj

Yes, not everyone can use guns to defend themselves.  Yes, the city and state have obligation to provide more protection.  However, the right exists whether the police can protect everyone or most everyone or not.  Of course, it is highly unlikely that any police force could do any of this.  But such ability is irrelevant to the basic underlying, pre-existing natural law right.

Handgun most common weapon used in civilian justifiable homicies.

No surprise here.  The handgun is the most frequently used weapon in civilian justifiable homicides.  Note, howerver, that the FBI's data grossly underreports the number of civilan (non-cop) justifiable homicides. 
The UCR measure of civilian jusifiable homicides (JH) is not reliable. First, and this is a problem with all UCR data, not all police agencies report, not all agencies use consistent criteria, and politics sometimes play a role in reporting and classifying. With regard to JH, remember that UCR data is reported by police. I would bet that except in the most obvious cases, police will report a possible justifiable homicide as a homicide as they have no way to know who to believe. The person claiming JH has a motive to lie and the police are not required to beieve the suspect. Further, police generally are cynical and don't want to appear to be gullible. Thus, reports by police in the UCR underestimate the real number of JH's. How do we know if something should arguably be counted as a JH? Later, the police may determine that a crime they reported as a criminal homicide (CH) was really a JH. This may come about because of ballistics tests, powder residue tests, or any number of causes. Do police go back and change their report to the UCR? Probaby not. They are busy collecting current data, and would have to admit that they were wrong. Police agencies have more pressing business than correcting reporting errors.Next, assume an alleged CH gets to the prosecutor's office. Further investigation may reveal that it was most likely a JH. The prosecutor drops the charges. Does the prosecutor report this to the UCR. No. The UCR is for police to report. Assume the prosecutor presents the case to the grand jury and they decide not to indict because they believe the CH was really a JH. This decison will never appear in UCR. Finally, assume the CH charge goes to trial and the jury finds that it was JH. This will never appear in the UCR. What the UCR actually represents is only the tip of the iceberg of JH's.  Later changes will never be reflected in the UCR. Research based on polls by Kleck, Gertz and other suggest that there are as many lawful defensive uses of firearms as there are unlawful use. These conclusions have been challenged, but this research has been replicated. Further, the crime-control/deterrent effect of citizen handgun ownership is not totally measure by the number dead criminals. Lawfully wounding or scaring off a violent criminal prevents a crime. If the criminal is deterred because he/she knows the person is armed, or has guns in the house, a crime is prevented. Unfortunately, there are no official statistics on this. See the link


http://www.guncite.com/gcdgklec.html



for a reprint of an article by the nation's leading criminological expert on gun control and related topics, FSU Prof. Dr. Gary Kleck.

More propaganda and inaccurate data on SYG and justifiable homicide.

The claim that Florida's SYG law led to a massive increase in justifiable homicides in that state is probably not true/accurate. Of course, those who are anti-gun, anti-self defense and anti-Second Amendment have latched on to this and the Trayvon Martin killing and created a propaganda cottage industry. As the nation's leading expert on gun crimes etc. FSU Prof. Gary Kleck states in the linked article, such rapid increases are much more likely to be the result in changes in statistical and reporting rules/formats than a change in human behavior. Rapid, huge changes in human behavior are usually statistical/reporting quirks. Further, the law rarely causes such large, rapid changes. Most citizens and criminals don't know the law. Sometimes I don't know if it is a lack of sophistication about law/statistics/reporting/human behavior or just plain ideological bias. Suffice it to say that there is a massive propaganda attack underway on the Second Amendment, concealed carry and self-defense.

9-1-1 Is a Joke in Detroit: Why people need the Second Amendment

Calling 9-1-1 in Detroit is a joke. Justifiable homicides by citizens have skyrocketed. These folks really need the Second Amendment. However, I reject the use of the pejorative term "vigilante." Vigilantism implies unlawful activity. Justifiable homicide is lawful in every state and under federal law. Thanks to Bennett Jones for the link