By Dr. Ray Kessler, who is, incidentally, a retired Prof. of Criminal Justice, former defense attorney and prosecutor is your host. I am also a part-time instructor in Criminal Justice at Richland College, an outstanding, 2-year institution in Dallas, TX. https://richlandcollege.edu/ Note that I do NOT select which ads run on the blog.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Nor should they be. Given the debatable accuracy of polygraphs, eyewitness identifications, bitemark and shoeprint analysis, the results of voice-stress tests generally belong outside of the courtroom. Even crime labs at federal, state, and city levels have been found lacking and flawed.
ReplyDeleteI thought this was an excellent website to get one thinking about the generally unreported problems in forensics:
http://www.innocenceproject.org/understand/Unreliable-Limited-Science.php
Like a Polygraph, a voice stress test is only as good as an operator's knowledge and experience. That said, a voice stress test seems more of a helpful guide to point law enforcement toward sources of usable evidence.
ReplyDeleteThe skills of a VSA operator are important but the unmeasurable "intangibles," as Jimmy the Greek used to say on television, make it a guide only.
ReplyDeleteAnother apparent travesty is in this opinion piece: http://www.thecrimereport.org/viewpoints/2012-04-arson-and-junk-science
Folks in prison over old disproven science...