"
If you are a Trump supporter, can you be an American patriot at the same time? Trump seems to be more more worried about Putin.
After President Trump’s ghastly performance
in Helsinki, a few sober conservatives joined a wide assortment of Democrats in
observing that it is not irrational to presume that Trump is in some way
“compromised.” Rep. Will Hurd (R-Tex.), a former CIA agent, wrote in the New
York Times on Thursday:
Over the course of my career as an
undercover officer in the C.I.A., I saw Russian intelligence manipulate many
people. I never thought I would see the day when an American president would be
one of them.
The president’s failure to defend the
United States intelligence community’s unanimous conclusions of Russian
meddling in the 2016 election and condemn Russian covert counterinfluence
campaigns and his standing idle on the world stage while a Russian dictator
spouted lies confused many but should concern all Americans. By playing
into Vladimir Putin’s hands, the leader of the free world actively participated
in a Russian disinformation campaign that legitimized Russian denial and weakened
the credibility of the United States to both our friends and foes abroad.
In other words, Trump is acting an awful
lot like a man under the sway of a hostile foreign power. Hurd is not alone in
thinking this.
Former House Intelligence Committee
chairman Mike Rogers (R-Mich.) observed Sunday on CNN’s “State of the
Union”: “The worst — the worst possible thing you can do is
give information from your own words that they can use against the credibility
of our intelligence and defense services around the world. That’s exactly what
the Russians are doing.” He added: “They’re taking the president’s words.
They’re injecting it into the influence operations and that’s causing a
problem.” Trump, in other words, is acting no differently from the way an
effective Russian asset would.
A third Republican steeped in
national intelligence matters agrees. NPR reports:
A GOP
Congressman and former FBI agent says he thinks President Trump was manipulated
by Russian President Vladimir Putin. Brian Fitzpatrick told NPR’s Michel Martin
on “All Things Considered” that he drew that conclusion after the two leaders
appeared in Helsinki.
“The
president was manipulated by Vladimir Putin,” Fitzpatrick said. “Vladimir Putin
is a master manipulator.” …
Fitzpatrick
sits on the House committees on Foreign Affairs and Homeland Security. In his
previous role as an FBI special agent, he said he was assigned to Ukraine and
worked on counterintelligence, collecting Russian propaganda reports.
He told
Martin he was “frankly sickened by the exchange” between Trump and Putin.
The
congressman, who represents Pennsylvania’s 8th District, said he shared his
view with former CIA agent and fellow House Republican Will Hurd of Texas. Hurd
wrote recently in The New York Times that Trump “actively participated in a
Russian disinformation campaign.”
The voters
at large have figured out that Russia is not a friend that deserves the benefit
of the doubt. According to the most recent NBC-Wall Street
Journal poll, “65 percent of voters believe the Russian government
interfered in the 2016 election (up 12 points from a year ago); 41 percent say
the interference affected the election’s outcome (up 8 points from a year ago);
and 30 percent think Democrat Hillary Clinton would have won without the
interference (up 6 points from last year).” Trump, however, continues to stick
with Putin’s line that the investigation into Russian manipulation of our
election is all a “hoax.”
Perhaps the
Russia investigation will solve the mystery of exactly what Putin has on Trump
— or whether Trump’s solicitude is settlement of a debt (figuratively, if not
literally) for bailing him out when he couldn’t get U.S. banks to lend him
money in the 2000s. It hardly matters what precisely is the source of leverage
— or even if Trump personally and privately colluded with Russians in the
campaign. (He did so publicly in calling for Russia to release emails hacked
from the Democratic National Committee; his son, son-in-law and campaign chief
Paul Manafort did so by meeting with a Kremlin-linked lawyer for the
purpose of getting “dirt” on Clinton.) Rather, the crucial problem is what to do
about a president beholden to a hostile power.Garry Kasparov
knows a thing or two about Russian intelligence operations. “While it’s
irresistible to theorize about what exactly Putin has on Trump to keep him on
such a tight leash, it’s more important to accept the fact that it is
happening,” he writes. “With the Mueller investigation indicting more Russian
agents and a potential Democratic takeover in the midterm elections threatening
to curtail Trump’s authority, Putin is rushing to squeeze everything he can
from his prized Oval Office asset before it is devalued.” He warns, “Aside from a few notable exceptions like
Sens. John McCain, Jeff Flake and Ben Sasse, the Republicans in Congress have
been far too quiet. They are afraid of losing in primaries to Trumpist
extremists, and fear has made them swallow their tongues. Many of these quietly
critical Republicans hope to outlast Trump by not confronting him and his
voters.” Democracy activist and former Russian chess impresario
This “dangerous delusion,” as Kasparov
describes it, results not only from naivete but also from Republicans’
self-interest. They fear the GOP base; they cannot bring themselves to admit
that they have enabled a pro-Russian operator. . . . In their refusal to admit error and risk the wrath of the
increasingly irrational GOP base, these lawmakers turn their foolish bet — that
they would mitigate Trump’s unfitness to serve in order to obtain policy goals
— into a conscious decision to put partisanship over country at a time that
Russia continues to wage a cyberwar against our democracy. (As #NeverTrump
conservative Charles Sykes puts
it, “Many Republicans have rationalized their support for Trump by
pointing to tax cuts, rollbacks in regulation and Trump’s appointments of
conservative judges. But last week reminded us how many of their values they
have been willing to surrender.”)
It’s not
only politicians who have fallen into this trap. Upwards of 80 percent of GOP
voters support Trump, and a throng of conservative media apologists insist
daily that it has all been worth it (to get tax cuts or judges or whatever).
Now, however, the issue is not whether it was “worth it” to have a racist
president, or an irrational one, or one who wasn’t Hillary Clinton, but whether
it was worth it to elect a president who takes the side of a hardened enemy of
the United States. No decent,
self-respecting American patriot should answer in the affirmative. Alas, far
too many in the GOP still do."
I don't see Putin as any sort of "hardened enemy" prior to our own efforts to make him so.
ReplyDeleteNATO expansion, the coup d'etat in Ukraine, the efforts against his ally in Syria...And the foolish sanctions hurt our supposed friends in Europe.
The Wolfowitz Doctrine antedates Putin...
Art
Putin has used murder as a political weapon. His invasion and annexation of the Crimea makes him an international outlaw without any respect for international law.
ReplyDelete