By Dr. Ray Kessler, who is, incidentally, a retired Prof. of Criminal Justice, former defense attorney and prosecutor is your host. I am also a part-time instructor in Criminal Justice at Richland College, an outstanding, 2-year institution in Dallas, TX. https://richlandcollege.edu/ Note that I do NOT select which ads run on the blog.
Tuesday, March 27, 2012
ObamaCare oral argument: Swing-vote Justice Kennedy expresses concerns
Oral argument in the ObamaCare case was held today in Washington. Kennedy, as is usually the case, is expected to be the swing vote. The 4 knee-jerk conservatives will vote against it and the 4 knee-jerk liberals will vote for it. Sometimes, as in D.C. v. Heller, Kennedy will tip his hand as to which way he is leaning and likely to vote. No clear indication from Kennedy today, but he seems to be troubled by the individual mandate. What he appears to be hinting at is that the federal government is not supposed to be a government of unlimited powers, but this mandate seems to be saying just that. Without some clear statement of limiting principles on this exercise of federal power, Kennedy may vote against ObamaCare. If some federal power limiting principle emerges, that allows ObamaCare, but doesn't turn the federal goverment into one of unlimited powers, Kennedy may find it constitutional. Stay tuned!
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
“Can you create commerce in order to regulate it?” (Justice Kennedy) is the real question that the government has to answer. To put it another way, is it "necessary and proper" to make everyone buy health insurance? I have to agree with Kennedy that without severe limits to federal power our esteemed elected representatives across the street from the Court will gladly slip right down that proverbial slope.
ReplyDelete-Mike
Liberals like Ginsburg used social security, an unconstitutional abomination in itself, to support Obamacare. It'd be laughable if not for seriousness of the matter. Rather than allow any part of this healthcare monstrosity to slip through SCOTUS, the court should send a clear message that other federal entitlement programs must eventually be dismantled, by attrition of course, returning all domestic sovereignty to the respective states.
ReplyDelete