tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7060696059642580878.post1804840677206806379..comments2023-10-30T07:53:58.018-05:00Comments on Crime, Law and Justice: Big 2nd Amend Case in ProcessAnonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09908922017589211092noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7060696059642580878.post-20863726498470316492012-09-13T15:57:01.161-05:002012-09-13T15:57:01.161-05:0044:
Thanks. As you suggest, people do not have to...44:<br />Thanks. As you suggest, people do not have to give a reason to exercise a constitutional right.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09908922017589211092noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7060696059642580878.post-21506105176902510372012-09-10T13:36:59.404-05:002012-09-10T13:36:59.404-05:00" ... the Secretary [of the state police] mus..." ... the Secretary [of the state police] must also make a determination that the applicant 'has good and substantial reason to wear, carry, or transport a handgun, such as a finding that the permit is necessary as a reasonable precaution against apprehended danger.' MD. CODE ANN., PUB. SAFETY § 5-306(a)(5)(ii)."<br /><br />This agency official suddenly has prophetic powers? Again, it's not up to law enforcement to choose which rationale law-abiding citizens get to exercise their 2nd amendment right to BEAR arms.<br /><br />In another overly regulated and taxed state, California has a similar law that has county sheriffs deciding who can carry. Of these peace officers, a few have thoughtfully provided everyday residents with a good reason to carry. For this, they are true American patriots. 44https://www.blogger.com/profile/12279323738793315123noreply@blogger.com